您好,欢迎来到试剂信息网! [登录] [免费注册]
试剂信息网
位置:首页 > 产品库 > Cefixime
立即咨询
咨询类型:
     
*姓名:
*电话:
*单位:
Email:
*留言内容:
请详细说明您的需求。
*验证码:
 
Cefixime
本产品不向个人销售,仅用作科学研究,不用于任何人体实验及非科研性质的动物实验。
Cefixime图片
CAS NO:79350-37-1
规格:98%
分子量:453.4
包装与价格:
包装价格(元)
5mg电议
10mg电议
25mg电议

产品介绍
third generation cephalosporin antibiotic
CAS:79350-37-1
分子式:C16H15N5O7S2
分子量:453.4
纯度:98%
存储:Store at -20°C

Background:

MIC: from<0.025 to 25 μg/ml for E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae


Cefixime is a third generation cephalosporin antibiotic.


The cephalosporins, a class of β-lactam antibiotics, are originally derived from the fungus Acremonium.


In vitro: Previous study found that cefixime was more active than cephalexin, cefaclor, and amoxicillin against various gram-negative bacteria. Cefixime was also significantly more active than tested reference drugs against clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, indole-positive and -negative Proteus species, Providencia species, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Moreover, cefixime was active against strains of K. pneumoniae, E. coli, as well as Proteus mirabilis resistant to the reference agents [1].


In vivo: The therapeutic activities of cefixime in mice infected with gram-negative bacilli were found to be far superior to the activities of cephalexin, cefaclor, and amoxicillin, but they were inferior to the activities against infection with Staphylococcus aureus [1].


Clinical trial: Previous study showed that the clinical success was observed in 94% of cefixime-treated patients. At the end of treatment, the overall eradication rate in the cefixime treatment group was 92% and ranged from 76% (cefaclor) to 98% (cefuroxime axetil) in the comparator treatment groups [2].


参考文献:
[1] Kamimura, T. ,Kojo, H.,Matsumoto, Y., et al. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial properties of FK 027, a new orally active cephem antibiotic. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 25(1), 98-104 (1984).
[2] Quintiliani R.  Cefixime in the treatment of patients with lower respiratory tract infections: results of US clinical trials. Clin Ther. 1996 May-Jun;18(3):373-90; discussion 372.