您好,欢迎来到试剂信息网! [登录] [免费注册]
试剂信息网
位置:首页 > 产品库 > Meropenem(SM 7338)
立即咨询
咨询类型:
     
*姓名:
*电话:
*单位:
Email:
*留言内容:
请详细说明您的需求。
*验证码:
 
Meropenem(SM 7338)
本产品不向个人销售,仅用作科学研究,不用于任何人体实验及非科研性质的动物实验。
Meropenem(SM 7338)图片
CAS NO:96036-03-2
规格:≥98%
包装与价格:
包装价格(元)
25mg电议
50mg电议
100mg电议
250mg电议
500mg电议
1g电议

产品介绍
理化性质和储存条件
Molecular Weight (MW)383.46
FormulaC17H25N3O5S
CAS No.96036-03-2
Storage-20℃ for 3 years in powder form
-80℃ for 2 years in solvent
Solubility (In vitro)DMSO: 76 mg/mL (198.2 mM)
Water: 8 mg/mL (20.9 mM)
Ethanol: <1 mg/mL
SMILESO=C(C(N12)=C(S[C@@H]3CN[C@H](C(N(C)C)=O)C3)[C@H](C)[C@]2([H])[C@@H]([C@H](O)C)C1=O)O
SynonymsSM-7338; ICI-194660; SM 7338; ICI 194660; SM7338; ICI194660; Vabomere.
实验参考方法
In Vitro

In vitro activity: Meropenem has an antibacterial spectrum which is broadly similar to that of imipenem but, whilst slightly less active against staphylococci and enterococci, it is more active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, all Enterobacteriaceae and Haemophilus influenzae. Meropenem is two- to four-fold more active than imipenem against Gram-negative organisms and its spectrum of antimicrobial activity is wider than those of all other drugs tested. Meropenem MICs are not significantly influenced by high inocula and the drug is generally bactericidal. Meropenem demonstrates antagonism with several other beta-lactams against strains producing Type I cephalosporinases. Meropenem binds most strongly to penicillin-binding protein 2 of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and to penicillin-binding proteins 1 of Staphylococcus aureus. Meropenem is a new carbapenem antibiotic which differs chemically from imipenem/cilastatin by having a 1-beta-methyl substitution, providing it with excellent intrinsic stability to human renal dehydropeptidase-I. Meropenem has one identified metabolite, a beta-lactam ring-opened form which is devoid of microbiological activity.


Kinase Assay: Meropenem (SM 7338), a new parenteral carbapenem demonstrated increased activity as compared to imipenem against 336 strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, 119 strains of Haemophilus influenzae, and 110 strains of H. Ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin demonstrated activity superior to that of both carbapenems while the activity of ceftazidime was similar to that of Meropenem (SM 7338).


Cell Assay: The meropenem MICs for penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae were higher than for the penicillin-susceptible strains but the organisms remained susceptible. Clinical susceptibility in vitro to meropenem was defined by MICs of ≤ 4 mg/L, intermediate susceptibility by MICs of 8 mg/L and MICs of ≥ 16 mg/L define resistance; equivalent figures for zones of growth inhibition were ≥ 14 (susceptible), 12-13 (intermediate) and ≤ 11 (resistant) mm[1].Meropenem was 2- to 4-fold more active than imipenem against Gram-negative organisms and its spectrum of antimicrobial activity was wider than those of all other drugs tested.Meropenem inhibited all anaerobic bacteria at less than or equal to 8 mg/l and 0.25 mg/l inhibited 50% of strains. Meropenem MICs were not significantly influenced by high inocula and the drug was generally bactericidal.Meropenem bound most strongly to penicillin-binding protein 2 of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and to penicillin-binding proteins 1 of Staphylococcus aureus. Meropenem had one identified metabolite, a β-lactam ring-opened form which is devoid of microbiological activity.

In VivoMeropenem significantly increases the plamsa total clearance of valproate to about 1.5 times the control (6.09 mL/min/kg vs. 4.28 mL/min/kg) in rabbits. Meropenem significantly increases the urinary excretion of valproate- glucuronide in rabbits.
Animal modelIn rabbits, meropenem significantly increased the plamsa total clearance of valproate to about 1.5 times compared to the control (6.09 mL/min/kg vs. 4.28 mL/min/kg). Meropenem significantly increased the urinary excretion of valproate- glucuronide in rabbits.
Formulation & Dosage6.09 mL/min/kg vs. 4.28 mL/min/kg
ReferencesJ Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:1-17; J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Sep;24 Suppl A:9-29; Pharm Res. 2001 Sep;18(9):1320-6.